Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Coventry

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Youth Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:

Coventry

Permalink  
 
So the official EFL statement says Coventry may resume playing their home games and that the cir***stances of the postponement of games against Wigan and Huddersfield continue to be investigated in line with EFL rules! Why no mention of Rotherham? Are we so insignificant in their eyes that they have just passed on this one! Whichever way it is it seems to be another example of the lack of respect given to us in the eyes of the EFL as opposed to the “Big Clubs!”

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 488
Date:
Permalink  
 
Does make you wonder Amiller, it also appears the rules are interpreted differently depending on the miscreants. Slightly different take, but I have just been reading a post on the other Millers platform about Watford selling a defender for £16M to an overseas club then taking him back on loan, keeping both the player and having a huge cash injection. Evidently this is a way of cirkumventing EFL financial rules and is quite legal, although quite a few clubs are angry about it. Watford are taking advantage of a loophole in the rules as both clubs are owned by the same family

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 61
Date:
Permalink  
 
The other club is Italian side Udinese. Both clubs are owned by the same family. Father owns Watford, Son owns Udinese.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.