You have convinced yourself gwru that you can judge a player immediately and that the players you continually mention are better than the people currently in the side. That being your starting point, I can see why you would go on to come up with bizarre conspiracy theories to explain their absence. My starting point on the other hand is that Warne will pick players who give us the best chance to get the best results and that he is a better judge of a player than you are. Particularly players that he works with every day. I would suggest to you that your position isnt really tenable. Your arguments are based on a totally flawed premise. You can't or won't see that but it is true.
I do see GWRU point of view sometimes that warne is perceived to be picking players not on form but on their character.
but alas we are just humble fans and if we don't like it we are free to follow another club
The table would seem to suggest that the form of the present team is pretty good. But what would be a really good idea is to drop all the players that have taken the club to the top of the league and fill the side with 19 and 20 year olds with just a few minutes league experience between them. Fantastic.
-- Edited by gwru on Thursday 16th of January 2020 11:18:04 AM
I hate to reveal this gwru - but it is!!
whose opinion. Warney's yes he picks the side. But nobody's telling me Crooks is better than Lindsay, no way. That we haven't had a left back all season whose made position his own. That Clarke & Hastie are better than Lamy, no way. This new winger we've got could be another dead legs got enough of them. Get shut of Hinds if you aren't going to play him, been too long now a reserve player.
-- Edited by gwru on Thursday 16th of January 2020 05:00:24 PM
Top of the league - Check. Cannot be caught by any team below them with games in hand - Check. Plus 19 goal difference - Check. Top scorers in the division - Check. Is the chosen one happy? Of course not. Warney keeps picking his boys and they keep winning. Keep stamping your feet. It won't make a blind bit of difference.
For some reason we find ourselves at the top of the league the only reason I can think of is money or the lack of it from other teams. See where we are in a couple of months time. Our leader has said he is not bringing in anymore players. Only 3 strikers defence no left back midfielder playing right back I can't see this run continuing some of those spinning plates are going to fall off . Either he is keeping his cards very close to his chest or we have spent our budget.
LOL. So the only reason that Rotherham are top of the pile is because the Ipswich's and Sunderland's of this world are rubbish. This fits in with your partner in crimes assertion that whenever a decent team play the Millers, they never turn up. Both of you want Paul Warne to fail Admit it.
Hope we leave the Ben Marshall offer alone now. Doesn't sound like he has much desire to play so hopefully we stay clear as we’ve had plenty of that type in the past.
-- Edited by gwru on Thursday 16th of January 2020 11:18:04 AM
I hate to reveal this gwru - but it is!!
whose opinion. Warney's yes he picks the side. But nobody's telling me Crooks is better than Lindsay, no way. That we haven't had a left back all season whose made position his own. That Clarke & Hastie are better than Lamy, no way. This new winger we've got could be another dead legs got enough of them. Get shut of Hinds if you aren't going to play him, been too long now a reserve player.
-- Edited by gwru on Thursday 16th of January 2020 05:00:24 PM
Crooks has more goals from midfield than any other player in the division apart from Madison at Peterborough, who is the subject of million plus pound bids from Championship teams. You don't rate him because you saw him misplace a pass off his weaker foot. Jesus, if I had a pound for every time your hero Will Vaulks put the ball into the seats off his good foot I would be quite a wealthy man. You decided after two minutes that for whatever reason you don't like Crooks. You wouldn't know a footballer if you fell over one pal. If you had your way Wood, Ihiekwe, Crooks, Barlaser, Ladapo, Vassell, Clarke, Thompson, Hastie, Olosunde, Jones, Mattock and Adelakun would all be playing their football elsewhere.
The bottom line is this gwru. You aren't a professional football manager. You don't see these players and even if you did you wouldn't have a clue what to do with them. You seem to think that you know better than everybody else including the professionals. You are a professional malcontent. You are deluded.
-- Edited by smiler on Thursday 16th of January 2020 07:00:12 PM
Hope we leave the Ben Marshall offer alone now. Doesn't sound like he has much desire to play so hopefully we stay clear as we’ve had plenty of that type in the past.
I wouldn't disagree with you C. We need players here who are hungry to play.
He has already done it when we were relegated last season simples.
Our wage bill on the playing side was half that of the next lowest in the league. A massively skewed playing field. We finished third from bottom and came close to staying up. Most people would regard that as a good effort at worst, and by some yardstick a fairly successful season. Your definition of success/failure is a very, very crude one.
Last season is done and dusted we were relegated that is what is on the record books a good try will never get a mention on them. Where we are now we need cover at centre half/ midfield plus a striker to say in the press that we don't need any more new faces in what is the reason if woody gets injured we have blown it.
So any manager that gets relegated should be sacked? Even Eddie Howe after performing the miracle of Dene Court? You have a very shallow knowledge of the game.
Evan's got sacked Harris at Millwall I am afraid it part of the job. You might not believe this but I also have been sacked from a few jobs down the pub and celebrated. For what ever reasons our chairman is backing him so will I it's not to say he will get criticised that also comes with the job. I doubt very much he will take any notice of any of us banterers.
