BornA WarneHater. Yet more tedious, repetitive posts criticising a manager who inherited a shambles and has turned us around and given us some pride back.
You've made it very clear that you loved Evans and Stubbs (lol) and you clearly hold a grudge against Warne. But your repeated attacks on him are became very boring a long time ago. You hinted that Warne was part of a conspiracy to keep us out of the Championship. How wrong was that? You couldn't wait for Peterborough to catch us after Evans rolled into town, citing the importance of experience and the ability to throw teacups, but it never happened did it? You couldn't wait for us to crumble in the play-offs, citing Warne's weakness and lack of experience under pressure, but it didn't happen did it? If all else failed a bit of puerile name calling wasn't beneath you. In fact you disappeared off the radar for a while after the Wembley win, and to this day have never acknowledged that Warne actually did a good job.
Now with the new season on the horizon you are at it again. According to you, Premier League clubs won't loan us players because they don't trust Warne to look after them. No evidence for that at all. In fact you seem to have overlooked that Fulham are a Premier League club and they happily sent Rodak back, but (as you say) never let the truth get in the way, eh? Now you are accusing Warne of lacking ambition. What the hell evidence have you got for that bull**** comment? And on the back of that you have fallen out with another respected poster on here - about the eighth by my reckoning which is not bad going because we only have a dozen or so regular contributors. You clearly can't wait for us to start losing in the Championship (which we may well do) so that you can ramp up your campaign, presumably based on the fact that Warne hasn't won the Euro Millions jackpot and invested it in players, which as far as I can see is all he is guilty of.
You seem to think you are very clever, but it is obvious to me and I suspect many others that you have an over inflated view of your own football insight and (for some reason) an enormous chip on your shoulder.
I am not attacking you as an individual, but if you continue to post garbage I will continue to call you out for it.
PS: YOU are writing statements that I don't
associate with AT ALL!
YOUR interpretation of all things football and the posts of others are just that - YOUR interpretation!
Your interpretation of my posts are mind boggling - wide of the mark - quite disturbing.
YOUR hang-ups / belief's are yours and yours alone.
Hold onto your hat young man - scapegoats and football fans are a long established tradition - but you fall right into the stereotype as not seeing who are the perpetrators of football problems. You need to read more and post less.
Although it was said that Maris failed his medical, reading between the lines the problem looks more financial, this is from the Cambridgeshire Live newspaper:
"The reason why the move fell through has not been made official yet, although it is believed that neither side could reach an agreement for the midfielder, while Cambridge United have not commented the situation either.
It will come as a disappointment to Millers boss Paul Warne who said in an interview on Wednesday [August 1] that he was looking to get a midfielder in before their Championship opener against Burton this week, having had two bids previously rejected."
Either way a bit disappointing we can't entice a L2 player into the Championship, but if they are asking for more than he's worth then best to leave well alone.
Selective memory surrounding this issue and ignorance of the financial ( and football ) side of the club at this time is quite apparent but the following note was made and generally ignored way back when....Someone wrote: "I've heard it said that stubbs wanted blackstock on a short deal as a stopgap..if its true, then someone else is responsible for the 3 year job, and theyre still at the club.. just what I've heard thats all.." It matters not now as there is the one constant regarding this issue and that's why let the truth spoil a good story.
A total classic. Someone wrote: "I've heard it said that stubbs wanted blackstock on a short deal as a stopgap..if its true, then someone else is responsible for the 3 year job, and theyre still at the club.. just what I've heard thats all"
LOL. As I have said before, your futile, vague non-existent fantasies to have a swipe at Paul Warne make you appear a five star di******d.
I totally understand you Born. You think that Tony Stewart is a charlatan who doesn't want or can't afford (or both) life in The Championship. Things would have been better if he had backed the genius Stubbs but Tony didn't have it in him to do that. Instead he forced Blackstock on him and hung Stubbs out to dry. You think that the Warne appointment was a case of engineering the relegation that Stewart wanted. Warne is a stooge - a popular incompetent who is a human shield between the Chairman and the supporters. A yes man who will enthusiastically deliver the failure that the Chairman craves. Much to the Chairman's frustration, Warne has proved to be a Clouseau. The bungling fool somehow got us back up through a combination of good luck and the appalling standard of League One, so now Tony will have to underinvest all over again to make sure we go back down again, and Warne will take the heat for it. Anyone who can't see what you see or who doesn't agree with you is an idiot, but you have it taped because of your experience of high level football and your superior intellect. How am I doing?
-- Edited by smiler on Saturday 4th of August 2018 06:11:11 AM
The TS point is not far off as I see it - I think he had enough of throwing money at the championship money pit because we can't afford it and there's still no guarantees! So he changed his business plan. No "real" or serial manager would buy into the low budget - so he did push Warne a little ( didn't he ? ) and we were relegated as an natural effect of this change of policy.
My opinion on this is that I respect TS for his brilliant chairmanship / management but you don't for some reason.
You appear to have a skewed attitude to history based on what I don't know but you appear to want YOUR TRUTH to be the only truth. GOOGLE - PROPAGANDA. I hope that helps.
"total classic. Someone wrote"
GO back to that era and READ! There is always 12 sides of the story in terms of football but you appear to be the blind ignorance side. Ignorance ( in law ) is not a defence - or something like that...lol
You are one hell of an argument for gun control.
Sunderland are currently 0-1 v Charlton...we are a good business under a great chief.....be thankful for small mercy's. But history is always history - but to understand it properly you need to read from all references.
OK. I could quote some of your very many snide digs at Warne back to you but it wouldn't serve a purpose. You don't recognise detail or fact that doesn't suit you. I will try one for luck just to test the water. You did say recently that PL clubs won't loan us their young players because of our management team. Do you recognise that you said that? Do you also recognise that you said it after Fulham had loaned Rodak back to us? Doesn't that tend to undermine your allegation? Do you have any hint of any evidence to support what you said? Or was it just a cheap, throw away dig?
I'll tell you what Born, the seasons about to start. Just forget it. I expect that I will still be shaking my head at many of your posts but I have to assume that in your own bizarre way you want the Millers to do well.
The midfield cupboard is almost empty. The strikers need speed and a bit of class as does our defence with the likes of Izzy or even large Fries who I would live to have right now. I suppose it's a bridge too far to suggest that outfield players are what we need. We can see today that a keeper will develop ( character ) our team as it stands. We still have a chance to get such gems and I hope we do. I will be suprised but very happy. Pedantic young man - your struggling.
