Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: team and formation for saturday

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 2415
Date:

team and formation for saturday

Permalink  
 

i am going 3 5 2 and 3 3 1 2

with no proper left back available warne shoudl start to get tactical and give doncaster something to think about

gk o donnell i dont rate price 

back 3 

ithiewe woods ayayi

***mings taylor potter towell newall

ball moore up front

as taylor could move up front with moore and ball playing behind them

 

subs

price jch forde frecks and the youngsters

 

emmauel can go back nothing against him but no shown any reason why we should play himm in front of ***mings

 



__________________
 

HM

 
 
 
 
Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 2270
Date:
Permalink  
 

I agree about Emmanuel, Ipswich can have him back tomorrow but our CB's are nowhere near good enough to play in a 3-5-2 formation plus I'm not sure our R & L midfielders would track back enough.
I'd go 442 like this
O'Donnell (last chance)
***mings
Ihewke
Wood
Mattock
Taylor
Potter
 
Vaulks
Newell
Moore
Ball
Subs; Price, Yates, Ajayi, JCH, Towell, Wiles, Frecklington



-- Edited by BradtheMiller on Thursday 9th of November 2017 07:43:33 AM

__________________

 

T71
First Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 854
Date:
Permalink  
 
Sounds like Frecks won't play. O'Donnell got to be. Can't go with Price. Right back I'm undecided. ***mings not convinced so Emmanuel gets the nod. Ihiewke & Ajayi centre backs. Hinds left back. Taylor Vaulks Potter Wiles Williams across the middle. Moore upfront. JCH 1st change striker.

__________________
Youth Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink  
 
Its not Warne's style at all, but i do think its a bit of a mind game with Frecks, i think he will be fit and will start, he will make a big difference to our midfield, id like to see taylor start in front of forde as well, 2-0 millers 👍 (i hope)

__________________
First Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 996
Date:
Permalink  
 
We're gonna be 4-5-1 surely that's his style.

__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 

Odd that David Ball didn't play at Bradford. Not sure what if anything to read into that.

Perhaps he should, but he won't play Hinds. He'll go with ***mings and Emmanuel at full backs. He would even play Vaulks at right back and ***mings or Emmanuel on the left before giving the young kid a run out.

My predicted team (4.5.1)

O'Donnell; ***mings, Ihiekwe, Wood, Emmanuel; Williams, Potter, Vaulks, Towell, Newell; Moore

Taylor, Ball, JCH, Ajayi, Forde among the subs.

Personally I would go with a 4.4.1.1:

O'Donnell; ***mings, Ihiekwe, Wood, Hinds; Williams, Potter, Towell, Newell; Ball; Moore



-- Edited by smiler on Friday 10th of November 2017 07:31:02 AM

__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
Date:
Permalink  
 
It's 4.4.1.1 for me with Taylor in the hole just behind Moore.

O'Donnell

Ihiekwe Ajayi Wood Emmanuel

Forde Towell Vaulks Newell

Taylor

Moore

__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1118
Date:
Permalink  
 
I'm a bit worried they are getting better and us getting worse.

I think we've lost our Mojo.

I'd play Taylor on wing /Moore & Ball up front - rest whatever...

o'Donnell in goal though not the other one...

UTM

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 404
Date:
Permalink  
 
What has Ball done to warrant a place ?. Granted Warne's new tactics of hoof ball don't play to his alleged strengths Ball is short and slow and somewhat disinterested. I think we have been rumbled but tomorrow I'd go with :-

Price, ***mings Ajayi Wood(last chance) Emanuel, Forde Potter Towell Newell, Taylor, Moore.

__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
I sort of agree with you Splinter but would put it differently. There is no point in picking Ball if you aren't going to play to his strengths. Smashing it over his head or asking him to partner Moore and latch on to flicks or knock downs - might as well pick Yates instead because that is more his game. Or give Taylor a go up there with Moore. Nothing wrong with going long if you have the players to do it and know that is what you are going to do. Play it to Ball's feet in the nice little pockets of space he is good at finding and he is a good player. I don't think he is disinterested - probably more like frustrated. Good as he has been (and it isn't his fault) when you have someone as good in the air as Moore is it is tempting to keep knocking it long. I think we have fallen into that trap more and more as the season has gone on and fallen between two stools. The team has been set up in a formation to play a passing game with one up front or one just behind Moore, but in reality have gone too long too early too often.

__________________
Youth Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:
Permalink  
 

No more Odonnell please it it is fairly obvious he is a source of unreliability, Price is better at stopping the ball going in our net, but has a a few problems with kckng etc, but is more solid.

id.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.