Sorry Ex but I can't help myself. We weren't negative under Redfearn. We had more efforts on goal per game than most teams and scored more goals per game under him than we did last season. I think thirteenth most in the division this season and higher than that over his tenure. Sometimes (not always) we tried to set up to counter attack. That isn't a negative tactic. If it is, Leicester must be sick of Ranieri's negativity. They play one up front most of the time, get nine men sometimes ten behind the ball and generally have far less possession than the opposition. The bottom line is that our inability to stop giving stupid goals away has been costing us. We were shocking against Charlton, it is true, but again ironically it was actually them hitting us on the counter while we committed men forward that cost us. You obviously feel quite strongly that Redfearn was negative and so it seems do many others, and I respect that view but I don't want that line to pass into folklore unchallenged, because I just don't think it is fair or right.