Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Nicky Eaden

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:

Nicky Eaden

Permalink  
 
Can anyone offer a sensible working theory to explain why we gave Redfearn's choice of assistant a two and a half year contract four days ago?

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 434
Date:
Permalink  
 
Looks like be easiest money this lad will earn he must think he's gone to funny farm

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
Because the man TS wants just said he will take the job.

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 434
Date:
Permalink  
 
Come on then who is it ?

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Date:
Permalink  
 
Because Redfearn was sacked after it came to light that he knew of simon Lenighan's pending conviction before he offered him a contract and kept it from the board.
The board only found this out after the internal investigation and Lenighans contract termination last week,The contract had already been offered to Eaden before all this came to light.


__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
Is that a theory Slider or are you saying it is the case?

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Date:
Permalink  
 
Its not a Theory,Its the truth.
I can't say how i know due to the source of this will get sombody in a lot of trouble.
This only came to light after the cancellation of the players contract.
From what i was told yesterday the board called Redfearn into a meeting at short notice after the players agent recieved the findings of the clubs investigation on his player that stated the player had not been truthfull about his situation regarding the pending court case.
The agent then sent correspondance back to the club denying the matter in hand and stating the manager was fully aware of the players pending court case as the agent was present during the whole discussions between Redfern and his player.


__________________
First Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 618
Date:
Permalink  
 
All very plausible. The club try to get out of paying Lenighan what he is owed due to him withholding information. The agent proves no information was withheld.

Redfearn sacked because of this with much reduced payoff but club cites league position to save face for both parties.

__________________
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink  
 
Well, if it is true my-my what a monumental foul up, that's not even naivety

__________________

FA Licensed Coach & Referee

 

Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
Interesting one Slider. It sounds to me like the sort of thing you could overlook if the manager was doing well (Lenighan was an embarrassment but no real financial damage done - he won't have been on any significant money while he was with us) but equally the sort if thing that you could use as a pretext if you wanted him out anyway for other reasons, perhaps without having to pay him any compensation. But then it doesn't chime in with the club statement that it was with a heavy heart and purely results based. Not sure what to make of it, but it would at least explain the apparent sudden change of mind.

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
does indeed sound plausible. If it is true then Good riddance. Liars cannot be trusted and it puts more evidence in to the 'weak' box that Redfern has been accused of and does seem to exude.

of course, I must add we cant be sure but if it were then there cant be any moans from Redfern and its the kid and Tony stewart that must be deeply hurt.

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 434
Date:
Permalink  
 
Just heard Jose Mourinio favourite for job. Well I didn't start talking b******s , how judgemental have we become even not knowing facts

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
Lenthemiller wrote:

Come on then who is it ?


 it was just a theory based on the suddenness of the decision Len.

Its what I would do if the situation had arisen whereby awful results and no improvement came together with a strong candidate giving the nod that hed be interested.  I was fantasising it could only be Warnock in such cir***stances due to him being at the game a couple of weeks ago and booked for a talk. All that cir***stantial evidence would give the chance for talks that could easily bend towards such a subject. I also wouldnt make such a drastic step unless there was a real calibre manager on board. 

 

Anyway, in light of sliders post, I must say that his post seems very plausible to me.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.