Its a complicated tale Mr Kid. Although it was the result of an error of judgement (much like marriage) there are some pros and cons.

However, it was never my intention for it to be anything other than a one-off mistake. An error perhaps or wishful thinking-a lapse of judgement. I must admit that when I saw it, I thought, I kinda like that-it reflects my feelings (a Freudian slip no less), but one I may get away with; like the 'slip-of the-tongue', I could pretend I didnt say it, or at least argue the meanings were mere reflections in the object and beg no ownership at all. Of course as Socrates knows, pleading such ignorance is a truth that those injured cannot endure. However, and not being nearly so brave in pursuit of truth as that dear fellow, I will explain further. 

Drawing attention to it created meaning for 'it'. 'it' has always been devoid of actual substance but in truth this is how the world understands meaning and since cause and effect cannot be escaped in this present universe (entirely at least) and to thus save any injury or complications that are wearisome and do not serve the truth, I will restate what didnt need stating originally.

It was just an idle occurrence without meaning beyond the forming of meaningless lines turned into symbolic representations of truth by the object that can never be wholly shared or assumed to be known by the subject. Indeed, as the object, one has no real substance at all, but then again neither do I seen in that light. We are only judged by our ignorance and the ignorance of others shall be our judge.

I hope that clarifies

-- Edited by ian on Wednesday 7th of October 2015 01:05:36 PM