Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Hammill

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
First Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 575
Date:

Hammill

Permalink  
 

released by Huddersfield. Can't remember if he was any good we've had that many on loan.



__________________
Ball Boy
Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:
Permalink  
 
I personally thought he was quite good, he just had a frustratingly small amount of playing time, due to Evan's reluctance to play him.

He would be quite a good signing as we don't seem to have a proper right winger, and we seem to lack width at the moment.

Other's may disagree.

__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1200
Date:
Permalink  
 

Like the OP I can't remember anything about him but that probably says more about me than it does about him.  I have fatally lost confidence in the Scottish maestro and suspect he'd have Messi on the bench and then loan him to a relegation rival.



__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
useless

__________________
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink  
 
We have the players, other than the 1 or 2 we're screaming out for I think we have enough to get us out of this before the window opens in Jan. Its the swallowing of pride / self proclamation of mistakes, players in right positions, not having favourites despite their woeful inefficiencies and above all either getting them fighting with belief (unlikely as wrong crowd for it) or playing them like the championship players that they are.

__________________

FA Licensed Coach & Referee

 

Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 136
Date:
Permalink  
 
Didnt really show any signs of promise, and when he did play he didnt offer us anything that we didnt already have. got the ball, 10-12 step overs, then give the ball away and/or fall over.

Would be a 'no' from me.

__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 

I started a different thread about use of wide players and gave some examples of wingers brought in who rarely played.  Hammill is another.  We had him for three months or so from memory and he may have started one or two matches (Wolves away?).  Other than that if he was on the bench at all he got ten minutes at the end either to kill the ball in the corner if we were in front or as a last throw of the dice if we needed a goal.  His best contribution was to set up Bowery to equalise against Norwich.  He didn't make much of an impact, although to be fair like so many others (especially of his ilk) he was given very little chance to.  For me, he lacked a yard of pace and tended to hang on to the ball too long. 



__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
and couldnt offer anything in defence.

Its a shame but thats what the game requires these days.



__________________
Youth Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date:
Permalink  
 
Like some on here we've had that many players on loan, all similar ilk, can't really remember any differences - well left alone then.
UTM

__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 112
Date:
Permalink  
 
Don't think he was good enough myself, did some good things, could beat players and hold onto the ball a bit, not much of a end product, probably be good in league one.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.