Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
 

Topic: Points deduction ahead?

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 499
Date:

Points deduction ahead?

Permalink  
 

Bolton further in the mire, hope they can sort themselves out with a new owner, after they are deducted points of course

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47457750



__________________
Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 499
Date:
Permalink  
 

Birmingham's EFL hearing re FFP rules is due anytime now. Could they be joining us in the relegation dogfight, and will that knock the stuffing out of them?



__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
what a mess.

I dont like to say it but the people in charge ought to be ashamed. What on earth were their motives for acquiring the club in the first place?

What kind of financial plan was there and who looked it over?



__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1715
Date:
Permalink  
 
The EFL's points deduction calculation will be as follows;

A. Calculate maximum points achievable by Rotherham United.
B. Add one.
C. Calculate minimum points achievable by Birmingham City
D. Deduct sufficient points from Birmingham City to equal B.





__________________
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink  
 
Hahaha Glenn - yeah under Steve Evans...I think Warney's sorted that relationship out with the suits with his all round nice guy approach (thank goodness!)

__________________

FA Licensed Coach & Referee

 

Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 499
Date:
Permalink  
 

Glenn, I think you could well be correct with your calculation, that nine point deduction is totally inadequate, and not even a financial charge to boot!!



__________________
Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 2270
Date:
Permalink  
 
Bolton will get away scot-free, Anderson & EFL'S Shaun Harvey are apparently bessies

__________________

 

Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 3056
Date:
Permalink  
 
Don't give a * more upset Judd Trump lost last night. Bring on Derby. Nobody will help us. Got to do it ourselves.

__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1715
Date:
Permalink  
 
The 9 point deduction for Birmingham is totally meaningless. What penalty have they actually suffered? Try none!!

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
I think its a little too early to say if its adequate punishment.

Im not aware of formula but perhaps there should be one.

However, it does actually put them in significant danger.

Also, the breaking of the rules occurred in the previous seasons. I think its hard to see a just outcome.



__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
They are in no real danger Ian. They have a four and five point cushion over a handful of relegation rivals and they are a team that has picked up more points per game and will probably still do so. They were warned that they could suffer a twenty one point deduction. They ran up 40 odd million pounds of debt over three years and flagrantly broke their agreement to rein it in. My question would be in the scheme of things exactly how big a debt and how flagrant would a clubs rule breaking have to be to get the full 21 point deduction? In the round, a penalty of less than half the maximum seems very lenient. It just feels a lot like they have 'conveniently' been given the biggest deduction possible that they could have been given that at the same time wasn't really going to change anything. As Glenn and others have said, in what way have they really been punished and in what way does it serve as a deterrent? It doesn't sit well.

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
www.youtube.com/watch

__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
Thanks for posting that Ian. Here is what i get from it. Birmingham consciously gamble on a massive overspend (wage bill 250% of income) to chase promotion. For that they get a transfer embargo. They then knowingly break the embargo thinking its worth the risk. For all that they get a punishment that doesn't hurt them one bit. So they were right - it was worth the risk. Birmingham will still finish above a club like us that us run prudently in accordance with the rules despite them having gained a massive competitive advantage from their cheating. The EFL dodges the issue and finds a solution that doesn't rock the boat and Birmingham are laughing. Shocking.

__________________
Vice-Captain
Status: Offline
Posts: 1715
Date:
Permalink  
 
That's an excellent summary Smiler. The whole saga, plus the ongoing debacle at Bolton, just sum up the state of football in this country. If we could relate it to a league table, avarice and corruption would be filling the automatic promotion slots, whereas integrity, fair play and sound financial management would be staring relegation in the face! Scandalous and very sad.

__________________
Moderator
Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
Date:
Permalink  
 
The FA should have power to step in here as in effect the league are bringing the game into disrepute with this shocking ruling.

Its reasons like this I hate the game at the top. Its only that I'm so involved in youth football that I still have a love for the game as it reminds me what football can be and mean, and not what it is (poisoned) at the top level.

__________________

FA Licensed Coach & Referee

 

Reserve Team
Status: Offline
Posts: 87
Date:
Permalink  
 
The unfairness lies in the fact that we were deducted all three of the points which we gained when playing Rawson, whereas Birmingham and most likely Derby, Villa and our important neighbours are being deducted a small fraction of the points they have accrued by breaking rules.

__________________
ian
Club Legend
Status: Offline
Posts: 6218
Date:
Permalink  
 
yes, I think there is a case for what Trevor Likely says.

Im not sure its a conspiracy or even unfair. It is difficult to make a comparison to show its unfairness as the facts in each case leading to points deduction and fines are different.

9 points are the penalty but its impossible to say why they decided 9 and not 12, or 6, etc.

There probably is some caution in the 9 points but it is also a precedent which is why they may feel it was about right. The deduction process would not have considered who it may help or hinder because this would be an impossible task to undertake as well as illegal.

I suspect its a case of human nature going for a little bit of exoneration from all sides.



__________________
Testimonial
Status: Offline
Posts: 4501
Date:
Permalink  
 
They bottled it. They knew Birmingham wouldn't appeal because the outcome doesn't affect Birmingham in real terms. So it doesn't really set a precedent at all. Its just a soft outcome - the maximum they could deduct whilst causing no real trouble, no alarms and no surprises. Like a cat on a stick, driven into frozen winter s**t. I wouldn't know how to post a link, but on the BBC Football site today there was a feature showing how much the clubs in The Championship lost last season and what their wage spend was as a percentage of income. 200% wasn't unusual. Birmingham weighed in at 250%. Blackburn lost £30m in their League One season and have lost £120m in the last five seasons. Wolves lost £60m in one year but got promotion. Their punishment - a golden ticket for the Premier League. It all stinks. Decisions like this one for Birmingham aren't going to change it.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.