Whilst it's good for a manager to question a reporters line of questioning (cos lets face it most of is it pure fishing), Pearson's outburst was cringe worthy and pretty unprofessional.
I can only imagine how difficult it is for any manager to have to confront the media at every twist and turn. BBC's Murphy gave a polished performance and to be a football manager, which does not necessarily mean you have the same standards of elocution, to have to take on such as Murphy needs a certain level of wisdom. Pearson I thought did well to hold it together against Murphy. He did not do so well against the earlier reporter and treated him with less than respect which I did not like to see. As for the fan who hurled abuse at Pearson earlier in the season, well for me he got what he deserved and I agreed with Pearson in that he would not apologise.
Many would say that handling the media is all part and parcel of the job but it doesn't mean that managers like it or can even deal with it. There are many that have had hissy fits at criticisms levied at them by reporters intent on feeding them questions with a barb attached. Whether they can be coached or even should be is questionable in my opinion.
To be in the public eye 24/7 must be an absolute nightmare, especially if your club has been staring relegation for most of the season. We all witnessed how a run of bad results and bad media talk affected our own SE before Christmas. Steve has his swagger back now but his confidence and his mojo were lost for periods of the season, resulting in him doing far less interviews. It is no coincidence that he is back on the media trail now and back with a force. To have folk pecking your head all the time about results and asking what went wrong all the time would blow my head off.
Could any or many of us actually be able to deal with the media any differently to Pearson - Given those exact cir***stances he found himself in - i.e. Results, Position in League, expectations and wolves circling him for the killer quote and more.
I for one couldn't. Is Pearson a bully, not sure he is
-- Edited by Millers4Ever on Friday 1st of May 2015 02:59:38 PM
-- Edited by Millers4Ever on Friday 1st of May 2015 03:00:30 PM
As you say every manager is under stress but not everyone gets aggressive and abusive.
I agree with your observations about the difficulty individuals are under and you express them well, but in my book Pearson (not anyone else) has some real flaws and stress is not an excuse.
If stress were an excuse it would excuse anyone's behaviour.
You are spot on about SE but he didnt rant or fight anyone because he doesnt have the same flaw as Pearson. When SE feels the pressure he is quick to offer some perspective. Nigel Pearson is a totally different character. No remorse because he doesnt get it.
Pearson could not understand a perfectly legitimate question and pursued the guy relentlessly. He had at least 3 opportunities to stop as others tried to interject but he was so arrogant and out of control he couldn't. There was nothing smart or clever about what Pearson did. In my book it qualifies as bullying because the reporter asked a legitimate question that Pearson then tried to put the fear of God in to him, which effectively stops you being able to do your job and relate in a safe and productive manner.
His tactics are the same as any bully.
Be in a position power/control.
Feel aggrieved.
Lack insight.
Abuse.
Blame the other.
Justify.
Do it again.
He gets paid more than enough to answer questions and fans invest enough money and emotion to expect him to answer them. He looks like he has been made to apologies and seems to be extremely angry. Thought the interviewer was brutal but very honest, makes a change. If I behaved like that at work I would be told to pull my head in.